Connect with us

Election Theft

Cyber Ninjas Found So Many Issues with the Voting Machines and Processes in Maricopa County It’s a Wonder the Previous Auditors Didn’t Find These Issues Too

Published

on

Ben Cotton’s team is auditing the IT-related practices and policies in the 2020 Election in Maricopa County.  He shared some important items during his presentation last week that any good IT auditor would find.

We pointed out previously that the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors hired two election firms because they knew these firms would give them a clean bill of health.

Wait Till the Citizens of Maricopa County Realize Their Board of Supervisors Wasted $100K on Bogus Audits to Help Cover Up the Real Results in the County

But Ben Cotton and his team were selected by the Cyber Ninjas to address the IT work related to Maricopa County’s results in the 2020 Election.  Investigator Cotton from CyFIR performed work that the previous auditors should have covered.

TRENDING: Philip Anderson: Capitol Police Killed Rosanne Boyland on Jan. 6 – “She Was Holding My Hand When She Died” (AUDIO)

It’s a difficult task for these auditors because Maricopa County has been completely uncooperative, even with basic questions, referring auditors to lawyers.  This all provides more support that the subjects under audit, the auditees, are guilty and doing everything they can to postpone the election.

Dominion has two full-time staff onsite servicing the Maricopa County election system. The current Dominion software was installed in August 2019. Since that date, there have been no antivirus updates, no operating system updates, or any security patches. Administrator accounts were also created on that date, each having the exact same password. These are actions of a ‘worst in class’ IT Department and it is a deliberate subterfuge of an election system.  Common practice is to update patches on a much more regular basis.

Below is a list of items addressed by Cotton during his presentation to the Arizona Senate last Thursday.

Auditors have collected over 2,000 Terabytes of data, the vast majority is video footage.
What Maricopa County has told the public is often drastically different than their response to the legal subpoena.

Maricopa didn’t use a forensically secure process to clone drives. Dates and times were altered by their cloning process.
On March 11th, 2021 someone with Admin access to the (EMS) election management system ran a script that produced 37,646 queries looking for blank passwords. The system has only 8 user accounts. (see below)
Windows Security Event Logs before February 5th, 2021 are missing.

Every election Administrator account, no matter the user, all have the same password.
When the Dominion software was installed in August 2019, Administrative passwords were created, and haven’t been changed since.

The vulnerabilities that exist on the Maricopa election systems would take an average script kiddie less than 10 minutes to gain access to these systems.
Maricopa’s election system uses ibutton key fobs as the 2nd step in logins. Maricopa and Dominion have refused to provide these fobs to auditors. (see below).

It’s become readily apparent there are severe cybersecurity problems with the way the election management system and network was maintained.

We are seeing anonymous logins at the system level that do not follow that pattern of normal Windows behavior.
After both sides agreed on a solution, Maricopa County then refused to release that router data.

Maricopa can’t check the configuration of its own election system without relying on Dominion employees.
The two EAC audits hired by Maricopa earlier in the year appear not to have addressed cybersecurity aspects, not even shared passwords.

Not a single bit of data was changed on any device in the auditor’s possession. Use of a “write block” device prevented this. Images were made bit by bit, then an MD5 hash value was applied. There is no need to purchase new machines.

There have been no antivirus updates, operating system updates, or security patches applied to the election system since August 2019, the date Dominion software was installed.

Maricopa repeatedly told the public the election system did not touch the internet but this was not true. If so the system could not have comingled with other Maricopa County department’s data. To prevent the release of router information, the Board of Supervisors and Sheriff then said election router data DID mingle with critical information from other county departments. By using EAC auditors, Maricopa told the public election machines were safe and secure. They now say those same auditors can’t be hired to test the same machines. This week they approved the purchase of new Dominion machines at $3 million.

EXCLUSIVE: Maricopa County’s Supervisors Decide to Purchase $3m More in Dominion Voting Machines Claiming They Were Decertified by Senate Audit – But They Never Were Properly Certified

The use of ibuttons is unusual for PC logins, and is very old technology. These ibuttons are typically used to verify a location or for access control. For instance, a security guard touches his ibutton to various doors to verify he walked his patrol. In Maricopa County, after you login as an election Admin, you must also use a preprogrammed ibutton to obtain access to the Dominion election system. Maricopa County stated only Dominion staff have the Admin ibuttons and both organizations have refused to help the auditors obtain them.

Overall, the IT-related observations of control practices to date are horrible.  In some cases, the County is using old technology.  In other cases, the processes are broken or even non-existent.  With such as mess, how did the IT election auditors hired by the county not notice them?

Read More

Election Theft

Reward Offered: $10,000 to the First Individual Who Can Successfully Address and Defend as Legitimate the 2020 Election Anomaly Referred to as the ‘Drop and Roll’

Published

on

How do you explain the phenomenon from the 2020 Presidential referred to as the ‘Drop and Roll’? 

To date, no one can provide a reasonable explanation of the anomaly uncovered in the 2020 Presidential Election referred to as the Drop and Roll.

Last year following the 2020 presidential election we uncovered data that made no sense – the results were impossible.  We called these observations across many states, the ‘Drop and Roll‘.  We summarized our observations in multiple state results from the 2020 Presidential Election in the following video:

TRENDING: Reward Offered: $10,000 to the First Individual Who Can Successfully Address and Defend as Legitimate the 2020 Election Anomaly Referred to as the ‘Drop and Roll’

We still haven’t received an adequate response for the Drop and Roll.

We did later correct the numbers in Virginia but it did not change our assertion.

Last year TGP was ‘fact-checked’ on the ‘Drop and Roll’, but the explanation fell flat on a number of levels.  Here is what was provided from one ‘fact-checker’ and our rebuttal.

Another Bogus Fact Check: Liberal Leaning “Fact-Checker” Claims Hundreds of Thousands of Ballots Dumped on Election Night for Biden and Ratio Reporting After That Were Completely Normal

(Note that these ‘fact checkers’ are often wrong or use baseless claims to support their arguments.  Their job appears not to get to the truth, but to attack an article that receives much attention, often using their own bias as their support.)

The response from the above ‘fact-checker’ fell flat.  There was no reasonable explanation for the drops in these states other than to say with COVID these votes were related to absentee ballots which all voted for Joe Biden.  This was an assumption and a quick pass on the issue.  How do these people know these ballot drops that appeared in the swing states, all at around 4am on November 4th were related to absentee ballots and why, in some cases, were the votes all for Biden?

One expert said the probability of this happening across multiple states was basically impossible.

Statistician in Texas Lawsuit Against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin Says Probability of Biden Winning Election Was One in a Quadrillion!

So today we announce that we are offering a reward of $10,000 to the first person who can explain the garbage returns from the 2020 election results in the states of Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, or Georgia referenced in the “drop and roll”video.  Contestants must explain which ballots apply to the recorded line entry for each state in the New York Times/Edison election data feed used last year to record the up-to-date results for each state.  By providing this information we can then confirm or deny the accuracy of the 2020 presidential election.

We welcome all participants,

Please send your entry to TGP: [email protected]

Read More

Continue Reading

Election Theft

LAA Voter Integrity Project: 157,299 Illegal Ballots Cast in Wisconsin Presidential ElectionCassandra Fairbanks

Published

on

Look Ahead America’s Executive Director Matt Braynard has announced that they have discovered at least 157,299 illegal ballots cast in the Wisconsin presidential election.

The amount of ballots that they believe to have been illegally cast is about eight times the 20,000 vote margin of victory in the election.

According to their report, which was released on Tuesday, the organization has identified seven tranches of illegal ballots.

Tranche 1: Early and Absentee Ballots Cast In the Names of Voters (EABCINV) registered illegally.
Tranche 2: Voters Illegally Claiming Indefinite Confinement (IC) Status as a Reason to Vote
Absentee. Wisconsin did not allow the COVID-19 quarantine as a reason to claim
indefinitely confined status.
Tranche 3: EABCINV matched to permanent, out-of-state moves in the National Change of
Address Database (NCOA). At the time we processed this match in mid-November, the database
contained records as far back as four years prior to as recent as October 1, 2020.
Tranche 4: EABCINV matched to Out of State Subsequent Registrations (OOSSR) using our
national voter database (NVD). In these cases, the voter had registered in Wisconsin and
matched to voters subsequently registered in another state.
Tranche 5: Election Day Ballots Cast In the Names of Voters (EDBCINV) registered illegally.
Tranche 6: EDBCINV matched to the NCOA and OOSSR.
Tranche 7: Unmatchable Invalid Residencies Among EABCINV and EDBCINV

TRENDING: Here We Go… CDC to Announce New Masking Regulations for Vaccinated Americans at 3 PM Presser

LAA noted that due to the limitations of time, budget, and the inability to access necessary government databases, they could only analyze the first four of seven tranches.

“Not accounting for any illegal ballots in Tranches 5, 6, and 7, we expect the number of illegal ballots to reflect the percentages we found in Tranches 1-4. Likely this number would come in at or around 157,299. This significantly exceeds the margin of victory in the 2020 General Election in Wisconsin, which was 20,695 (as per the vote recount),” the report explains. “Whether using the likely projections or the bare minimum, which assumes everything that we did not examine or could not determine was legal, we must conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that the deserved winner of the state of Wisconsin’s Presidential Electoral Votes in the 2020 General Election is unknowable. It also does indicate that widespread voter fraud definitely occurred on a statewide scale as per our findings and Wisconsin’s Supreme Court 2020 ruling, and furthermore that sitting state representatives knew about this situation as per their own family members claiming the status illegally”

One of the ways in which they found illegal ballots was by matching voter addresses to “the known lists of postal box facilities (USPS, FedEx, UPS, etc.) and similar addresses where individuals could not live. We found that many registrants disguised box numbers as ‘Apt’ numbers, ‘Suites’, and ‘Units.’” It is illegal to use an address that is not your own when registering.

“In some cases, these facilities exist at the same addresses of legitimate apartment buildings, however we scrubbed our list of any potential false positives by calling the management companies as well as investigating property records. In other cases, these individuals claimed to reside at businesses that our systems flagged due to their location beside a USPS/UPS/FedEx drop off box,” the report explains. “While these were not technically postal box registrations, the individuals registered at these addresses neither resided, owned, nor even worked at these businesses, which was why we marked these registrations as illegal.”

According to the report, “Look Ahead America is an America First nonprofit dedicated to standing up for patriotic Americans who have been forgotten by our government. We aren’t just talk; we’re action. That action means deploying our R.E.T. (Register, Educate, Turnout to Vote) field programs across the country. It means leading Patriot Actions and training citizens to lobby their state and local governments for America First causes. And it means ensuring voter integrity by investigating cases of illegal ballots and advocating for election reform to prevent them from being cast in the first place.”

“The Voter Integrity Project (VIP) was started by Matt Braynard in the aftermath of the 2020 Election and was brought under the aegis of Look Ahead America. The mission of the VIP is to finish the investigation into illegal ballots cast in 2020, sanitize states’ voter lists ahead of future elections to eliminate the possibility of illegal ballots being cast, and to fight for real voter integrity reforms.”

Wisconsin State Representative Janel Brandtjen issued a press release on Monday calling for an Arizona-style audit of the state’s election.

“Voters have made it clear that they want a thorough cyber-forensic examination of tabulators, ballot marking devices, and other election equipment, which I will be helping facilitate on behalf of the committee as chair… IP addresses, chain of custody on ballots, and audit trail logs must be thoroughly inspected by cyber-audit technicians… While WI is in the process of an election audit, I will be working to ensure that it is augmented with expertise and resources to ensure a comprehensive, forensic examination.”

Read More

Continue Reading

Election Theft

SICK: FOX Host Bret Baier Uses Maricopa County Official Who Trashed Audit for Months to Attack Trump Spox Liz Harrington in Outrageous Setup

Published

on

Earlier tonight President Trump spokesperson Liz Harrington joined FOX News host Bret Baier to discuss the latest results announced by the Arizona forensic audit team in their explosive testimony on the historic Maricopa County forensic audit.

During her segment, Liz pointed out all of the fraudulent numbers coming from Maricopa County.  She also reported on the 100 to nothing numbers coming from Fulton County Georgia.

Harrington asked, “If we still have a free country with one set of rules for every American.  Those votes need to be thown out immediately.  ? Or do we live in a communist country where votess turn out 100 to nothing?  No that does not say for Joseph Stalin that says Joseph Biden!”

TRENDING: Dem Senator Schumer Attacks Trump Supporters: ‘How Could 74 Million People Vote For a Despicable, Racist, Vile Man?’ (VIDEO)

But her interview was a setup.

Immediately following her segment Bret Baier asked dirtbag Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer on his show to “correct” Liz Harrington.  Richer has been bashing the audit process for months now.  Richer pushed back on the forensic audit in Arizona.

And tonight he was asked about Liz Harrington’s evidence presented by the forensic auditors in Arizona.  Baier bought it.

Notice, Bret Baier did not ask Richer on first — he asked Liz Harrington on first.
Bret Baier does not even pretend to hide his anti-Trump bias anymore.

Liz responded to the setup by Bret Baier later tonight with a Bret Baier flashback.

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending